From: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
I believe that many (but by no means all) of the religious sentiments of humankind are indeed a childish hangover and eventually need to be surrendered. Most fundamentalists, in this sense, are indeed refusing to grow up cognitively.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
No, it is not by a "return to Nature" that humans can end their alienation and unhappy consciousness, but rather by moving forward to the third great stage of development and evolution, that of nondual Spirit.
words by Ken Wilber
 
 
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Thus, the empirical scientist is right that the EEG will not say that this fourth state of consciousness is more real (or is disclosing higher realities) than the other states. But neither will the EEG machine say that waking is more real than dreaming or compassion better than murder. If empirical scientists maintain that waking is more real than dreaming, or compassion better than murder, or tolerance better than bigotry, then they will likewise have to hold open the possibility that the meditative state is an opening to the Divine even more real than waking, because that is exactly what is subjectively announced in all of those cases.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
All future metaphysics and authentic spirituality must offer direct experiential evidence. And that means, in addition to sensory experience and its empiricism (scientific and pragmatic) and mental experience and its rationalism (pure and practical), there must be added spiritual experience and its mysticism (spiritual practice and its experiential data).
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Likewise with the existence of Spirit: we cannot theoretically or verbally or philosophically or rationally or mentally describe the answer in any other ultimately satisfactory fashion except to say: engage the injunction. If you want to know this, you must do this. Any other approach and we would be trying to use the eye of mind to see or state that which can be seen only with the eye of contemplation, and thus we would have nothing but metaphysics in the very worst sense – statements without evidence.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
The real battle is not between science, which is "real," and religion, which is "bogus," but rather between real science and religion, on the one hand, and bogus science and religion, on the other.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
If science can surrender its narrow empiricism for a broader empiricism (which it already does anyway), and if religion can surrender its bogus mythic claims in favor of authentic spiritual experience (which its founders uniformly did anyway), then suddenly, very suddenly, science and religion begin to look more like fraternal twins than centuries-old enemies.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Religion's great, enduring, and unique strength is that, at its core, it is a science of spiritual experience (using "science" in the broad sense as direct experience, in any domain, that submits to the three strands of injunction, data, and falsifiability).
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
It is only when religion emphasizes its heart and soul and essence  – namely, direct mystical experience and transcendental consciousness, which is disclosed not by the eye of flesh (give that to science) nor by the eye of mind (give that to philosophy) but rather by the eye of contemplation – that religion can both stand up to modernity and offer something for which modernity has desperate need: a genuine, verifiable, repeatable injunction to bring forth the spiritual domain.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Authentic spirituality, then, can no longer be mythic, imagi-nal, mythological, or mythopoetic: it must be based on falsi-fiable evidence. In other words, it must be, at its core, a series of direct mystical, transcendental, meditative, contemplative, or yogic experiences – not sensory and not mental, but transsensual, transmental, transpersonal, transcendental consciousness – data seen not merely with the eye of flesh or with the eye of mind, but with the eye of contemplation. Authentic spirituality, in short, must be based on direct spiritual experience, and this must be rigorously subjected to the three strands of all valid knowledge: injunction, apprehension, and confirmation/rejection – or exemplar, data, and falsifiability.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
If religion is to survive in a viable form in the modern world, it must be willing to jettison its bogus claims, just as narrow science must be willing to jettison its reductionistic imperialism.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
As it is now, the Popperian falsifiability principle has one widespread and altogether perverted use: it is implicitly restricted only to sensory data, which, in an incredibly hidden and sneaky fashion, automatically bars all mental and spiritual experience from the status of genuine knowledge. This unwarranted restriction of the falsifiability principle claims to separate genuine knowledge from the dogmatic, but all it actually accomplishes, in this shrunken form, is a silent but vicious re-ductionism.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
The strength of empiricism is its demand that all knowledge be grounded in experiential evidence, and I agree entirely with that demand. But, as we saw, not only is there sensory experience, there is mental experience and spiritual experience.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
For the enduring strength of science – the reason it can indeed plop a person on the moon – is that it always attempts, as best it can, to rest its assertions on evidence and experience. But sensory experience is only one of several different but equally legitimate types of experience, which is precisely why mathematics – seen only inwardly, with the mind's eye – is still considered scientific (in fact, is usually considered extremely scientific!).
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
There is sensory experience, mental experience, and spiritual experience – and empiricism in the very broadest sense means that we always resort to experience to ground our assertions about any of those domains (sensory, mental, spiritual).
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
On the one hand, "empirical" has meant experiential in the broadest sense. To say that we have empirical verification simply means that we have some sort of direct experiential evidence, data, or confirmation. To be an "empiricist" in this broad sense simply means to demand evidence for assertions, and not merely to rely on dogma, faith, or nonverifiable conjectures.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
We might find that "science" in the broadest sense does not have to be confined to sensory patches, but might include a science of sensory experience, a science of mental experience, and a science of spiritual experience.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Any single perspective is likely to be partial, limited, perhaps even distorted, and only by taking multiple perspectives and multiple contexts can the knowledge quest be fruitfully advanced.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
It was the aggressive and violent attempt to reduce all knowledge to empirical representation that constituted the disaster of modernity – the reduction of translogical spirit and dialogical mind to monological sensory knowing.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Thus, to put it bluntly, exterior surfaces can be seen, but interior depth must be interpreted. And precisely because this depth is an intrinsic part of the Kosmos – it is the Left-Hand dimension of every holon – interpretation itself is an intrinsic feature of the Kosmos. Interpretation is not something added onto the Kosmos as an afterthought; it is the very opening of the interiors themselves. And since the depth of the Kosmos goes "all the way down," then, as Heidegger famously put it, "Interpretation goes all the way down."
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
But if you want to know the meaning of the play, you will have to read it and enter into its interiority, its meaning, its intentions, its depths. The only way you can do that is by interpretation: What does this sentence mean? Here empirical science is virtually worthless, because we are entering interior domains and symbolic depths, which cannot be accessed by exterior empiricism but only by introspection and interpretation. Not just objective, but intersubjective. Not just monological, but dialogical.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Note, then, the overall sequence of development: from nature to humanity to divinity; from subconscious to self-conscious to superconscious; from prepersonal to personal to transpersonal; from id to ego to God. But Spirit is nonetheless fully present at each and every stage as the evolutionary process itself: Spirit is the process of its own self-actualization and selfunfolding; its being is its own becoming; its Goal is the Path itself.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Prerationality includes all of the modes leading up to rationality (such as sensation, vital life feeling, bodily emotion, and organic sentiment), and, by its very nature, tends to exclude rationality, no matter what lip service it might give to it. Transrationality, on the other hand, lies on the other side of reason. Once reason has emerged and consolidated, consciousness can continue to grow and develop and evolve, moving into transrational, transpersonal, and supraindividual modes of awareness. Transrationality, unlike prerationality, happily incorporates the rational perspective, and then adds its own defining characteristics; it is thus never antireason, but, in a friendly way, transreason.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Not what is right for me and my tribe, or me and my mythic religion, or me and my nation, but what is right and fair for all peoples regardless of race or creed. For when I act in this worldcentric – not egocentric, not ethnocentric, but worldcentric – fashion, I am free in the deepest sense, for I am obeying not an outside force but the interior force of my own ethical reasoning: I am autonomous, I am deeply free.
words by Ken Wilber
 
added by: admin   from: The Marriage of Sense and Soul
Because modernity differentiated the I and the IT, individual whim could no longer establish what was objectively true. What the I believed about objective reality now had to be checked against empirical facts, thus curbing the magical and mythical attempts to coerce the Kosmos through egocentric ritual and petition.
words by Ken Wilber
 
 
1 2